- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C200 Comfort 4G vs 110 4G
Funker C200 Comfort 4G vs HMD 110 4G
What C200 Comfort 4G does better (0) and where 110 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Camera3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
C200 Comfort 4G110 4G
| C200 Comfort 4G | 110 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm | −21.1 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.5 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 10.4 mm | +10.9 mm |
| Weight | 128 g | 94 g | +34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than 110 4G?
C200 Comfort 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 110 4G better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- Weight128 g vs 94 g+37%
- Thickness21.3 mm vs 10.4 mm2×
- Dual SIMNo · C200 Comfort 4G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 128 g | 94 g |
| Thickness | 21.3 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm |
| Width | 52 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Grey | Blue, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 28% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | — | 1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.12 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
