dotrising.com
Compare
H67G vs Galaxy S24 FE

Energizer H67G vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

What H67G does better (4) and where Galaxy S24 FE wins (25) — every spec side by side.

Energizer · 2024H67G

6.1Score

4 advantages≈ $330

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

25 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

6.2Display8.1

5.3Camera9.3

3.2Battery3.8

6.0Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

H67GGalaxy S24 FE

	H67G	Galaxy S24 FE	Difference
Height	178.6 mm	162 mm	+16.6 mm
Width	84 mm	77.3 mm	+6.7 mm
Thickness	13.5 mm	8 mm	+5.5 mm
Weight	287 g	213 g	+74 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is H67G better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+4%
Selfie camera24 MP vs 10 MP2.4×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S24 FE: No
Pixel density396 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than H67G?

RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
OLED panelNo · H67G: Yes
Optical stabilisationNo · H67G: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · H67G: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · H67G: Yes
NFCNo · H67G: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · H67G: Yes
Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
CPU frequency2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+55%
Rear cameras1 vs 33×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Energizer H67G≈ $3306.1	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8
Design
Weight	287 g	213 g
Thickness	13.5 mm	8 mm
Height	178.6 mm	162 mm
Width	84 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Black, Grey, Red	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,372 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	72.8%	88%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 720	Exynos 2400e
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC3	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,548,896
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,299
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,889
Memory
RAM	4 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	48 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	24 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	4,900 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	18 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.1	5.3
NFC	No	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A