How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Energy E241 vs 150 (2020)

Energizer Energy E241 vs Nokia 150 (2020)

What Energy E241 does better (3) and where 150 (2020) wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Energizer Energy E241
Energizer · 2019Energy E241
3.6Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Nokia 150 (2020)
Nokia · 2020150 (2020)
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $30
2.1Display2.1
2.2Battery2.0
2.4Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Energy E241150 (2020)
54 × 125.314.550.5 × 13215
Energy E241150 (2020)Difference
Height125.3 mm132 mm−6.7 mm
Width54 mm50.5 mm+3.5 mm
Thickness14.5 mm15 mm−0.5 mm
Weight72 g90 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Energy E241 better than 150 (2020)?

  1. Battery capacity1,900 mAh vs 1,020 mAh+86%
  2. Weight72 g vs 90 g+26%
  3. Thickness14.5 mm vs 15 mm+3%

Why is 150 (2020) better than Energy E241?

  1. Bluetooth2.1 vs 3+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight72 g90 g
Thickness14.5 mm15 mm
Height125.3 mm132 mm
Width54 mm50.5 mm
ColoursBlack, Carbon black, Gray, White, Orange, Carbon RedCyan, Red, Black
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio26.4%26.8%
Performance
ChipsetSpreadtrum SC7731EMediaTek
Chip maker—MediaTek
CPU cores4—
CPU frequency1.3 GHz—
GPUMali-820—
Memory
RAM0 GB—
Storage (max)4 GB—
Storage (base)4 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Selfie camera0.3 MP—
Battery
Battery capacity1,900 mAh1,020 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
Bluetooth2.13
NFCNoNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SAR (head)—0.43 W/kg
Software
OS at launchKaiOS 2.5.1—
PlatformiOS—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare