How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Energy E220 vs T909

Energizer Energy E220 vs Tel.Me. T909

What Energy E220 does better (5) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Energizer Energy E220
Energizer · 2019Energy E220
3.6Score
5 advantages
Higher score
vs
Tel.Me. T909
Tel.Me.T909
1 advantage
2.2Display3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Energy E220T909
59 × 11916.544 × 10922
Energy E220T909Difference
Height119 mm109 mm+10 mm
Width59 mm44 mm+15 mm
Thickness16.5 mm22 mm−5.5 mm
Weight112 g95 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Energy E220 better than T909?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 600 mAh+67%
  2. Memory card slotYes · T909: No
  3. Dual SIMYes · T909: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
  5. Thickness16.5 mm vs 22 mm+33%

Why is T909 better than Energy E220?

  1. Weight112 g vs 95 g+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight112 g95 g
Thickness16.5 mm22 mm
Height119 mm109 mm
Width59 mm44 mm
ColoursBlack, Dark blue3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue
Display
Screen size2.2″—
PanelTFT LCDMonochrome graphic
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px—
Resolution (height)320 px—
Pixel density182 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio21.3%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6572—
Chip makerMediaTek—
Process28 nm—
CPU cores2—
CPU frequency1.3 GHz—
GPUMali-400—
Memory
RAM0.25 GB—
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh600 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
Bluetooth2.1—
NFCNo—
USBmicroUSB 2.0—
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Software
OS at launchKaiOS 2.5.1—
PlatformiOS—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare