How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Energy E220 vs 125

Energizer Energy E220 vs Nokia 125

What Energy E220 does better (2) and where 125 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Energizer Energy E220
Energizer · 2019Energy E220
3.6Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Nokia 125
Nokia · 2020125
3.5Score
4 advantages≈ $20
2.2Display2.1
2.0Battery2.0
2.4Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Energy E220125
59 × 11916.550.5 × 13215
Energy E220125Difference
Height119 mm132 mm−13 mm
Width59 mm50.5 mm+8.5 mm
Thickness16.5 mm15 mm+1.5 mm
Weight112 g91 g+21 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Energy E220 better than 125?

  1. Memory card slotYes · 125: No
  2. Pixel density182 ppi vs 167 ppi+9%

Why is 125 better than Energy E220?

  1. Weight112 g vs 91 g+23%
  2. Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio21.3% vs 26.8%+26%
  4. Thickness16.5 mm vs 15 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 125Nokia 125≈ $203.5
Design
Weight112 g91 g
Thickness16.5 mm15 mm
Height119 mm132 mm
Width59 mm50.5 mm
ColoursBlack, Dark blueBlack, White
Display
Screen size2.2″2.4″
PanelTFT LCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density182 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio21.3%26.8%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6572MediaTek
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process28 nm—
CPU cores2—
CPU frequency1.3 GHz—
GPUMali-400—
Memory
RAM0.25 GB—
Memory card slotYesNo
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,020 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4—
Bluetooth2.1—
NFCNoNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SAR (head)—0.43 W/kg
Software
OS at launchKaiOS 2.5.1—
PlatformiOS—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare