- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E28 vs 105 4G
Energizer E28 vs HMD 105 4G
What E28 does better (3) and where 105 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E28105 4G
| E28 | 105 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 134.5 mm | 126.1 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Width | 56 mm | 50.5 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Thickness | 16.9 mm | 10.4 mm | +6.4 mm |
| Weight | 113 g | 93 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E28 better than 105 4G?
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh2.1×
- Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio32.2% vs 28%+15%
Why is 105 4G better than E28?
- Bluetooth2.1 vs 52.4×
- Weight113 g vs 93 g+22%
- Pixel density143 ppi vs 167 ppi+17%
- Thickness16.9 mm vs 10.4 mm+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 113 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 16.9 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 134.5 mm | 126.1 mm |
| Width | 56 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, White, Green, Brown, Yellow | Black, Pink, Cyan |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.2% | 28% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Spreadtrum SC6531E | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | — | 1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.12 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
