- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E20+ vs T909c
Energizer E20+ vs Tel.Me. T909c
What E20+ does better (3) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20+T909c
| E20+ | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 129 mm | −24 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 44 mm | +8.6 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm | +1.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20+ better than T909c?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 600 mAh+67%
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than E20+?
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 18 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 80 g |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | — |
| Panel | TFT | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Connectivity | ||
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
