- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E20+ vs OneTouch 4042s
Energizer E20+ vs TCL OneTouch 4042s
What E20+ does better (0) and where OneTouch 4042s wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20+OneTouch 4042s
| E20+ | OneTouch 4042s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 137.5 mm | −32.5 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 57.5 mm | −4.9 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 13.6 mm | +6.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20+ better than OneTouch 4042s?
E20+ has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is OneTouch 4042s better than E20+?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+50%
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Bluetooth3 vs 5+67%
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 13.6 mm+46%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 111 g |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 13.6 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 137.5 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 57.5 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | Unisoc UMS9117L |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
