- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E20+ vs 125
Energizer E20+ vs Nokia 125
What E20+ does better (2) and where 125 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20+125
| E20+ | 125 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 132 mm | −27 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 50.5 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15 mm | +4.9 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20+ better than 125?
- Memory card slotYes · 125: No
- Screen-to-body ratio32.3% vs 26.8%+21%
Why is 125 better than E20+?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · E20+: Yes
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 15 mm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 91 g |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 132 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.3% | 26.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 3 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.43 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
