- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E20+ vs 105 4G
Energizer E20+ vs HMD 105 4G
What E20+ does better (1) and where 105 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20+105 4G
| E20+ | 105 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm | −21.1 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 50.5 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 10.4 mm | +9.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20+ better than 105 4G?
- Screen-to-body ratio32.3% vs 28%+15%
Why is 105 4G better than E20+?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · E20+: Yes
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 10.4 mm+90%
- Bluetooth3 vs 5+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 93 g |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 10.4 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 126.1 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | Black, Pink, Cyan |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.3% | 28% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.12 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
