- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Leva X10 vs Galaxy A17
Doro Leva X10 vs Samsung Galaxy A17
What Leva X10 does better (1) and where Galaxy A17 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Display7.0
2.0Battery3.9
2.1Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Leva X10Galaxy A17
| Leva X10 | Galaxy A17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.4 mm | 164.4 mm | −36 mm |
| Width | 67.6 mm | 77.9 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Weight | 117 g | 192 g | −75 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Leva X10 better than Galaxy A17?
- Weight117 g vs 192 g+64%
Why is Galaxy A17 better than Leva X10?
- Battery capacity1,150 mAh vs 5,000 mAh4.3×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 6.7″2.8×
- CPU frequency1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz2.4×
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 385 ppi2.3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Leva X10: Yes
- 5GNo · Leva X10: Yes
- NFCNo · Leva X10: Yes
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 1,080 px4.5×
- Screen-to-body ratio20.6% vs 86%4.2×
- CPU cores1 vs 88×
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+69%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 117 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 128.4 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 67.6 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | White | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | TFT | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 738 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 20.6% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T127 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Exynos |
| Process | — | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 1 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 435,787 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,048 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 365 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | — | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | — | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,150 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 48% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.67 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Mocor RTOS | Android 15 |
| Platform | Other | Android |
| Interface | Mocor RTOS | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 44 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsSamsung Galaxy A55
7.18.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsSamsung Galaxy A35
7.17.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsXiaomi Redmi 15C
7.16.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsTelekom T Phone 3
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsMotorola Moto G Power (2025)
7.17.2


