How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 1880 vs 6310 (2024)

Doro 1880 vs Nokia 6310 (2024)

What 1880 does better (2) and where 6310 (2024) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Doro 1880
Doro · 20231880
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Nokia 6310 (2024)
Nokia · 20246310 (2024)
3.5Score
4 advantages≈ $75
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

18806310 (2024)
67 × 1281356 × 135.514.1
18806310 (2024)Difference
Height128 mm135.5 mm−7.5 mm
Width67 mm56 mm+11 mm
Thickness13 mm14.1 mm−1.1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 1880 better than 6310 (2024)?

  1. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
  2. Thickness13 mm vs 14.1 mm+8%

Why is 6310 (2024) better than 1880?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. Dual SIMNo · 1880: Yes
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio20.9% vs 32%+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Doro 1880Doro 1880≈ $953.6
Design
Weight114 g—
Thickness13 mm14.1 mm
Height128 mm135.5 mm
Width67 mm56 mm
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack, RedBlack, Green
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.9%32%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocUnisoc 6531F
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Memory
RAM—0.008 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Software
OS at launchMocor OS—
PlatformOther—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare