How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 1880 vs 5710 XpressAudio

Doro 1880 vs Nokia 5710 XpressAudio

What 1880 does better (2) and where 5710 XpressAudio wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Doro 1880
Doro · 20231880
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $95
vs
Nokia 5710 XpressAudio
Nokia · 20225710 XpressAudio
3.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
2.0Display2.1
3.0Camera3.0
2.0Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

18805710 XpressAudio
67 × 1281357.7 × 138.916.2
18805710 XpressAudioDifference
Height128 mm138.9 mm−10.9 mm
Width67 mm57.7 mm+9.3 mm
Thickness13 mm16.2 mm−3.2 mm
Weight114 g129 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 1880 better than 5710 XpressAudio?

  1. Weight114 g vs 129 g+13%
  2. Thickness13 mm vs 16.2 mm+25%

Why is 5710 XpressAudio better than 1880?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. Dual SIMNo · 1880: Yes
  3. Screen-to-body ratio20.9% vs 22.3%+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Doro 1880Doro 1880≈ $953.6
Design
Weight114 g129 g
Thickness13 mm16.2 mm
Height128 mm138.9 mm
Width67 mm57.7 mm
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack, RedBlack/White, Red/White
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.9%22.3%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocUnisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU frequency—1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.047 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—microUSB 2.0
USB version—2
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
SAR (head)—1.28 W/kg
Software
OS at launchMocor OS—
PlatformOther—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare