How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 1880 vs 225 4G (2024)

Doro 1880 vs Nokia 225 4G (2024)

What 1880 does better (0) and where 225 4G (2024) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Doro 1880
Doro · 20231880
3.6Score
0 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Nokia 225 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024225 4G (2024)
3.6Score
5 advantages≈ $80
2.0Display2.1
3.0Camera3.0
2.0Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

1880225 4G (2024)
67 × 1281352 × 121.511.6
1880225 4G (2024)Difference
Height128 mm121.5 mm+6.5 mm
Width67 mm52 mm+15 mm
Thickness13 mm11.6 mm+1.4 mm
Weight114 g90 g+24 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 1880 better than 225 4G (2024)?

1880 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is 225 4G (2024) better than 1880?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. Weight114 g vs 90 g+27%
  3. Dual SIMNo · 1880: Yes
  4. Screen-to-body ratio20.9% vs 28.2%+35%
  5. Thickness13 mm vs 11.6 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Doro 1880Doro 1880≈ $953.6
Design
Weight114 g90 g
Thickness13 mm11.6 mm
Height128 mm121.5 mm
Width67 mm52 mm
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack, RedPink, Dark Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.9%28.2%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocUnisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency—1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP0.3 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
USB version—2
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launchMocor OS—
PlatformOther—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare