How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. 1880 vs 215 4G (2024)

Doro 1880 vs Nokia 215 4G (2024)

What 1880 does better (1) and where 215 4G (2024) wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Doro 1880
Doro · 20231880
3.6Score
1 advantage≈ $95
Higher score
vs
Nokia 215 4G (2024)
Nokia · 2024215 4G (2024)
3.5Score
5 advantages≈ $95
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

1880215 4G (2024)
67 × 1281354.2 × 127.311.6
1880215 4G (2024)Difference
Height128 mm127.3 mm+0.7 mm
Width67 mm54.2 mm+12.8 mm
Thickness13 mm11.6 mm+1.4 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 1880 better than 215 4G (2024)?

  1. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%

Why is 215 4G (2024) better than 1880?

  1. Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
  2. Dual SIMNo · 1880: Yes
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  4. Screen-to-body ratio20.9% vs 35.2%+68%
  5. Thickness13 mm vs 11.6 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Doro 1880Doro 1880≈ $953.6
Design
Weight114 g—
Thickness13 mm11.6 mm
Height128 mm127.3 mm
Width67 mm54.2 mm
Ingress protectionIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack, RedPeach, Black, Dark Blue
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.9%35.2%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocUnisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency—1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
Battery
Battery capacity1,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth55
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launchMocor OS—
PlatformOther—
Interface—Series 30
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare