- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 1880 vs SIMPLICITY V27 4G
Doro 1880 vs Emporia SIMPLICITY V27 4G
What 1880 does better (2) and where SIMPLICITY V27 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Battery2.0
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
1880SIMPLICITY V27 4G
| 1880 | SIMPLICITY V27 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128 mm | 125.3 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 57.6 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 12.6 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 90 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 1880 better than SIMPLICITY V27 4G?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2″+20%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 176 px+36%
Why is SIMPLICITY V27 4G better than 1880?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,200 mAh+20%
- Weight114 g vs 90 g+27%
- Thickness13 mm vs 12.6 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 114 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 13 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 128 mm | 125.3 mm |
| Width | 67 mm | 57.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black, Red | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2″ |
| Panel | TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 176 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 220 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 20.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Mocor OS | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
