- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V Max S vs Camon 40 Pro
Doogee V Max S vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro
What V Max S does better (5) and where Camon 40 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display8.5
6.7Camera9.1
8.8Battery7.3
8.9Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
V Max SCamon 40 Pro
| V Max S | Camon 40 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164.3 mm | +14.2 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 74.6 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Thickness | 26.3 mm | 7.3 mm | +19 mm |
| Weight | 536 g | 179 g | +357 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V Max S better than Camon 40 Pro?
- Battery capacity22,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh4.2×
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 40 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Camon 40 Pro better than V Max S?
- Weight536 g vs 179 g3×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · V Max S: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · V Max S: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Thickness26.3 mm vs 7.3 mm3.6×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V Max S: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · V Max S: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 536 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 26.3 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 83.1 mm | 74.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Tarnish, Titanium | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,045 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.3% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 700,909 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,218 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 873 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2. |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 22,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 147 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.58.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GvsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.58.6
vs
Apple iPhone 17vsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.88.6
vs
Apple iPhone AirvsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.48.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GvsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgevsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.88.6


