- dotrising.com
- Compare
- S41T vs Camon 20 Pro
Doogee S41T vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What S41T does better (3) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Display7.2
3.4Camera6.4
8.6Battery6.0
6.0Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
S41TCamon 20 Pro
| S41T | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 163.4 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 76.7 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 16.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Weight | 262 g | 190 g | +72 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is S41T better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Battery capacity6,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+26%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than S41T?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · S41T: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · S41T: Yes
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Weight262 g vs 190 g+38%
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+38%
- Pixel density293 ppi vs 395 ppi+35%
- Thickness16.2 mm vs 7.8 mm2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 262 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 16.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 77.8 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 293 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 61.7% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,300 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15vsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6
vs
Tecno Camon 40 ProvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
8.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Tecno Camon 20 ProvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A15 5GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.66.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.56.6


