- dotrising.com
- Compare
- N40 Pro vs Galaxy A32
Doogee N40 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A32
What N40 Pro does better (3) and where Galaxy A32 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.2Display6.9
5.8Camera7.1
7.7Battery4.0
3.5Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
N40 ProGalaxy A32
| N40 Pro | Galaxy A32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.9 mm | +6.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.4 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 184 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is N40 Pro better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging24 W vs 15 W+60%
- Battery capacity6,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
Why is Galaxy A32 better than N40 Pro?
- Main camera20 MP vs 64 MP3.2×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · N40 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · N40 Pro: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 411 ppi+53%
- Weight210 g vs 184 g+14%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
- Thickness9.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 165.2 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Brown, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 814 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 286,666 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,277 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 20 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,380 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 24 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A32
4.85.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A73 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
8.05.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.15.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23vsSamsung Galaxy A32
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03vsSamsung Galaxy A32
3.95.8