- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade20 Ultra vs Moto G86
Doogee Blade20 Ultra vs Motorola Moto G86
What Blade20 Ultra does better (5) and where Moto G86 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display9.1
4.6Camera8.4
7.9Battery7.1
7.3Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade20 UltraMoto G86
| Blade20 Ultra | Moto G86 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174 mm | 161.2 mm | +12.8 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 74.7 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 7.8 mm | +8 mm |
| Weight | 326 g | 185 g | +141 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade20 Ultra better than Moto G86?
- Battery capacity10,300 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+98%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Endurance per cycle84 h vs 56 h+52%
- Battery charge cycles1,100 vs 1,000+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Moto G86 better than Blade20 Ultra?
- Wired charging18 W vs 30 W+67%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade20 Ultra: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight326 g vs 185 g+76%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 446 ppi+67%
- Process12 nm vs 4 nm3×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+39%
- Thickness15.8 mm vs 7.8 mm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 326 g | 185 g |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 174 mm | 161.2 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Red, Silver | Pantone: Spellbound, Golden Cypress, Cosmic Sky, Chrysanthemum |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,712 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,360 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1% | 89.2% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 885,764 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,042 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 30 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 84 h | 56 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
