- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade20 Turbo vs Super 26 Ultra
Doogee Blade20 Turbo vs itel Super 26 Ultra
What Blade20 Turbo does better (8) and where Super 26 Ultra wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display9.5
6.1Camera5.9
8.6Battery7.0
8.2Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade20 TurboSuper 26 Ultra
| Blade20 Turbo | Super 26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 174 mm | 164 mm | +10 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.8 mm | +5.4 mm |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 6.8 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 333 g | 168 g | +165 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade20 Turbo better than Super 26 Ultra?
- Battery capacity10,300 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+72%
- Wired charging33 W vs 18 W+83%
- 5GYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Blade20 Turbo?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- OLED panelNo · Blade20 Turbo: Yes
- Weight333 g vs 168 g+98%
- Pixel density267 ppi vs 392 ppi+47%
- Thickness15.8 mm vs 6.8 mm2.3×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.1% vs 112.7%+52%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 333 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 174 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Desert Titanium, Black | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.1% | 112.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Unisoc T7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.5" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,300 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,100 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 85 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6