- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade GT vs Super 26 Ultra
Doogee Blade GT vs itel Super 26 Ultra
What Blade GT does better (10) and where Super 26 Ultra wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display9.5
8.0Camera6.0
6.7Battery7.0
8.2Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GTSuper 26 Ultra
| Blade GT | Super 26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164 mm | +14.5 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.8 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 6.8 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Weight | 260 g | 168 g | +92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT better than Super 26 Ultra?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- 5GYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Blade GT?
- OLED panelNo · Blade GT: Yes
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+9%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight260 g vs 168 g+55%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 32 MP+60%
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 6.8 mm+54%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.1% vs 112.7%+54%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 112.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Unisoc T7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6