- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade GT Ultra vs Moto G57 Power
Doogee Blade GT Ultra vs Motorola Moto G57 Power
What Blade GT Ultra does better (11) and where Moto G57 Power wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display7.0
7.6Camera5.8
7.6Battery8.3
8.2Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GT UltraMoto G57 Power
| Blade GT Ultra | Moto G57 Power | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 166.2 mm | +12.3 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 76.5 mm | +7 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 8.6 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 260 g | 211 g | +49 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT Ultra better than Moto G57 Power?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Memory card slotYes · Moto G57 Power: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+4%
- Battery charge cycles1,300 vs 1,000+30%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Moto G57 Power better than Blade GT Ultra?
- Battery capacity5,500 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+27%
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Ultra: Yes
- Endurance per cycle30 h vs 64 h2.1×
- Weight260 g vs 211 g+23%
- eSIMNo · Blade GT Ultra: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Blade GT Ultra: Yes
- Energy classE vs B
- Repairability classC vs A
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.1% vs 85.8%+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 166.2 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Meteorite, Regatta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 85.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno |
| AnTuTu score | — | 829,894 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,892 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.8" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,300 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | 64 h |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsTecno Camon 40
8.08.0
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsInfinix Note 50s
8.08.0
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsRealme 14T
8.08.0
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsTecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
8.08.2
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsMotorola Moto G24 Power
8.06.5
vs
Motorola Moto G57 PowervsMotorola Moto G54 Power
8.07.3


