- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade GT Play vs Galaxy A56
Doogee Blade GT Play vs Samsung Galaxy A56
What Blade GT Play does better (5) and where Galaxy A56 wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display8.1
5.6Camera7.9
6.8Battery5.1
7.6Features9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GT PlayGalaxy A56
| Blade GT Play | Galaxy A56 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.2 mm | +16.3 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77.5 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Weight | 265 g | 198 g | +67 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT Play better than Galaxy A56?
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+16%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy A56: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 12 MP+33%
Why is Galaxy A56 better than Blade GT Play?
- Wired charging18 W vs 45 W2.5×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Weight265 g vs 198 g+34%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- eSIMNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Energy classE vs B
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 265 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 162.2 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Pink, Olive, Graphite, Lightgray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,213 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 87.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Exynos 1580 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Xclipse 540 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 908,689 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,899 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,332 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.61 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 36 h | 45 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A57vsSamsung Galaxy A56
8.88.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsSamsung Galaxy A55
8.58.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
8.58.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsTecno Camon 40 Pro
8.58.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
8.58.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsSamsung Galaxy A35
8.57.7


