- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Blade GT Play vs Super 26 Ultra
Doogee Blade GT Play vs itel Super 26 Ultra
What Blade GT Play does better (5) and where Super 26 Ultra wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display9.5
5.6Camera5.9
6.8Battery7.0
7.6Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Blade GT PlaySuper 26 Ultra
| Blade GT Play | Super 26 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164 mm | +14.5 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.8 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 6.8 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Weight | 265 g | 168 g | +97 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Blade GT Play better than Super 26 Ultra?
- 5GYes · Super 26 Ultra: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Super 26 Ultra better than Blade GT Play?
- OLED panelNo · Blade GT Play: Yes
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Weight265 g vs 168 g+58%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Thickness10.5 mm vs 6.8 mm+54%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.1% vs 112.7%+54%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 265 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm | 6.8 mm |
| Height | 178.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 83.5 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Silver, Blue, Gold, Silver/Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.1% | 112.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 | Unisoc T7300 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), unspecified sensors |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,400 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 36 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 Pro 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.77.6
vs
Infinix Hot 60 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
OPPO A5 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.67.6
vs
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Provsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6
vs
Infinix Note 50 4Gvsitel Super 26 Ultra
7.87.6