dotrising.com
Compare
X90 vs Galaxy S24 FE

Cubot X90 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

What X90 does better (8) and where Galaxy S24 FE wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2024X90

7.8Score

8 advantages≈ $310

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

17 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

8.3Display8.1

7.4Camera9.3

7.2Battery3.8

5.0Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

X90Galaxy S24 FE

	X90	Galaxy S24 FE	Difference
Height	162.2 mm	162 mm	+0.2 mm
Width	74 mm	77.3 mm	−3.3 mm
Thickness	9.4 mm	8 mm	+1.4 mm
Weight	207 g	213 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X90 better than Galaxy S24 FE?

RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+9%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 10 MP3.2×
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Weight207 g vs 213 g+3%
Pixel density395 ppi vs 385 ppi+3%

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than X90?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · X90: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · X90: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · X90: Yes
5GNo · X90: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · X90: Yes
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 1,900 nits+27%
Max video1080p vs 8K
4K selfie videoNo · X90: Yes
eSIMNo · X90: Yes
Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot X90≈ $3107.8	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8
Design
Weight	207 g	213 g
Thickness	9.4 mm	8 mm
Height	162.2 mm	162 mm
Width	74 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Green, Black	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,500 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,372 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.5%	88%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Exynos 2400e
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,548,896
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,299
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,889
Memory
RAM	16 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.8"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	1080p	8K
4K video frame rate	—	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	—	B
Battery charge cycles	—	2,000
Endurance per cycle	—	42 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A