- dotrising.com
- Compare
- X50 vs Galaxy A52
Cubot X50 vs Samsung Galaxy A52
What X50 does better (1) and where Galaxy A52 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display6.9
7.7Camera8.7
6.4Features5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
X50Galaxy A52
| X50 | Galaxy A52 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 159.9 mm | +6.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.1 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 189 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X50 better than Galaxy A52?
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
Why is Galaxy A52 better than X50?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · X50: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · X50: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X50: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · X50: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+15%
- Weight213 g vs 189 g+13%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 407 ppi+3%
- Process12 nm vs 8 nm+50%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.4 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 159.9 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 794 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 84.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 261,282 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,865 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 313 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | microUSB | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.35 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 6.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9


