How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. Pocket vs C200 Comfort 4G

Cubot Pocket vs Funker C200 Comfort 4G

What Pocket does better (5) and where C200 Comfort 4G wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cubot Pocket
Cubot · 2022Pocket
5.0Score
5 advantages
Higher score
vs
Funker C200 Comfort 4G
Funker · 2022C200 Comfort 4G
0 advantages≈ $55
3.2Camera3.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

PocketC200 Comfort 4G
58 × 11912.552 × 10521.3
PocketC200 Comfort 4GDifference
Height119 mm105 mm+14 mm
Width58 mm52 mm+6 mm
Thickness12.5 mm21.3 mm−8.8 mm
Weight128 g128 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pocket better than C200 Comfort 4G?

  1. Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 1,000 mAh3×
  2. Main camera16 MP vs 0.3 MP53.3×
  3. Screen size4″ vs 2.4″+67%
  4. Dual SIMYes · C200 Comfort 4G: No
  5. Thickness12.5 mm vs 21.3 mm+70%

Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than Pocket?

C200 Comfort 4G has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight128 g128 g
Thickness12.5 mm21.3 mm
Height119 mm105 mm
Width58 mm52 mm
ColoursBlack, Black/Red, Green/GoldGrey
Display
Screen size4″2.4″
PanelIPS LCDTFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)540 px—
Resolution (height)1,080 px—
Pixel density302 ppi—
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Screen-to-body ratio59.8%—
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T310—
Chip makerUnisoc—
Process12 nm—
CPU cores4—
CPU frequency2 GHz—
GPUPowerVR GE8300—
Memory
RAM4 GB—
Storage (max)64 GB—
Storage (base)64 GB—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera16 MP0.3 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Selfie camera5 MP—
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity3,000 mAh1,000 mAh
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5—
NFCYes—
USBUSB Type-C—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO—
Features
Stereo speakersNo—
3.5 mm headphone jackNo—
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 11—
PlatformAndroid—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare