dotrising.com
Compare
Max 5 vs Galaxy A55

Cubot Max 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A55

What Max 5 does better (9) and where Galaxy A55 wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Cubot · 2024Max 5

8.2Score

9 advantages≈ $320

Higher score

Samsung · 2024Galaxy A55

8.1Score

14 advantages≈ $270

7.0Display7.4

7.7Performance6.3

6.9Camera8.4

7.2Battery5.0

7.9Features8.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Max 5Galaxy A55

	Max 5	Galaxy A55	Difference
Height	173.9 mm	161.1 mm	+12.8 mm
Width	78.9 mm	77.4 mm	+1.5 mm
Thickness	9.2 mm	8.2 mm	+1 mm
Weight	223 g	213 g	+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Max 5 better than Galaxy A55?

AnTuTu score1,171,088 vs 635,598+84%
Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,810 vs 3,259+17%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+13%
Screen size7″ vs 6.6″+5%
USB version3.1 vs 2+55%

Why is Galaxy A55 better than Max 5?

OLED panelNo · Max 5: Yes
Peak brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Max 5: Yes
Stereo speakersNo · Max 5: Yes
Memory card slotNo · Max 5: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Max 5: Yes
4K selfie videoNo · Max 5: Yes
eSIMNo · Max 5: Yes
Weight223 g vs 213 g+5%
Thickness9.2 mm vs 8.2 mm+12%
Charged in 30 min50% vs 55%+10%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Cubot Max 5≈ $3208.2	Samsung Galaxy A55≈ $2708.1
Design
Weight	223 g	213 g
Thickness	9.2 mm	8.2 mm
Height	173.9 mm	161.1 mm
Width	78.9 mm	77.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP67
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx7
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Tech Black, Pearl White	Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon
Display
Screen size	7″	6.6″
Panel	IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,460 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	387 ppi	390 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,010 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	83.6%	85.8%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8200	Exynos 1480
Chip maker	MediaTek	Exynos
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.1 GHz	2.75 GHz
GPU	Mali-G610 MC6	Xclipse 530
AnTuTu score	1,171,088	635,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,810	3,259
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,024
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	100 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.8"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	13.4 h
Wired charging	33 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	55%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.1	2
Video output	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-25.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.68 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 8.5
Major OS updates promised	—	4
EU label
Energy class	E	—
Battery charge cycles	900	—
Endurance per cycle	30 h	—
Repairability class	B	—
Drop resistance class	B	—