- dotrising.com
- Compare
- KingKong Power vs Moto G84
Cubot KingKong Power vs Motorola Moto G84
What KingKong Power does better (3) and where Moto G84 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display8.0
5.2Camera8.0
8.6Battery4.3
7.3Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong PowerMoto G84
| KingKong Power | Moto G84 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 169.9 mm | 160 mm | +9.9 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 74.4 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 7.6 mm | +12.4 mm |
| Weight | 382 g | 167 g | +215 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Power better than Moto G84?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.1×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Wired charging33 W vs 30 W+10%
Why is Moto G84 better than KingKong Power?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Weight382 g vs 167 g2.3×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Power: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong Power: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Power: Yes
- Thickness20 mm vs 7.6 mm2.6×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong Power: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5.1+21%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.9% vs 85.7%+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 382 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 169.9 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 80.2 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.9% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 389,015 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,824 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.5" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.5 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | My UX |
