- dotrising.com
- Compare
- KingKong ES Pro vs Poco C81 Pro
Cubot KingKong ES Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
What KingKong ES Pro does better (8) and where Poco C81 Pro wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Display6.3
6.4Camera3.4
4.9Battery6.6
4.4Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong ES ProPoco C81 Pro
| KingKong ES Pro | Poco C81 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172.6 mm | 171.6 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 79.5 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 8.2 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Weight | 268 g | 208 g | +60 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong ES Pro better than Poco C81 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 13 MP4.9×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Repairability classB vs C
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+11%
- Pixel density269 ppi vs 254 ppi+6%
Why is Poco C81 Pro better than KingKong ES Pro?
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+18%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Weight268 g vs 208 g+29%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · KingKong ES Pro: Yes
- Energy classB vs A
- Drop resistance classB vs A
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+5%
- Thickness12.8 mm vs 8.2 mm+56%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 268 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 12.8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 172.6 mm | 171.6 mm |
| Width | 81.2 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | — |
| Colours | Black/Orange | Black, Gold, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,612 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.8% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 401,382 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,457 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/3.06" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | 67 h |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| Drop resistance class | B | A |
