- dotrising.com
- Compare
- KingKong AX vs Galaxy A55
Cubot KingKong AX vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What KingKong AX does better (6) and where Galaxy A55 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.4
7.0Camera8.4
7.2Battery5.0
6.0Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong AXGalaxy A55
| KingKong AX | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 161.1 mm | +10.9 mm |
| Width | 80.9 mm | 77.4 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8.2 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Weight | 296 g | 213 g | +83 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong AX better than Galaxy A55?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A55: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Pixel density401 ppi vs 390 ppi+3%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than KingKong AX?
- OLED panelNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- 5GNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Weight296 g vs 213 g+39%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- 4K selfie videoNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- eSIMNo · KingKong AX: Yes
- Thickness12.7 mm vs 8.2 mm+55%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 296 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 12.7 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 80.9 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 75% | 85.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | E | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 30 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A56vsSamsung Galaxy A55
8.58.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A36vsSamsung Galaxy A55
8.18.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A55vsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
8.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy A17vsSamsung Galaxy A55
7.18.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy A55
9.58.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A55vsSamsung Galaxy A26
8.17.5


