- dotrising.com
- Compare
- KingKong Ace 5 vs Redmi Note 14 4G
Cubot KingKong Ace 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
What KingKong Ace 5 does better (3) and where Redmi Note 14 4G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display8.4
5.2Camera6.4
8.6Battery6.5
6.0Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong Ace 5Redmi Note 14 4G
| KingKong Ace 5 | Redmi Note 14 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 177.2 mm | 163.3 mm | +13.9 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 76.6 mm | +6.7 mm |
| Thickness | 15.6 mm | 8.2 mm | +7.4 mm |
| Weight | 352 g | 196 g | +156 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong Ace 5 better than Redmi Note 14 4G?
- Battery capacity10,200 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+85%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is Redmi Note 14 4G better than KingKong Ace 5?
- Main camera48 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- OLED panelNo · KingKong Ace 5: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · KingKong Ace 5: Yes
- Weight352 g vs 196 g+79%
- Pixel density260 ppi vs 395 ppi+52%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Thickness15.6 mm vs 8.2 mm+90%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.5% vs 85.9%+15%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 352 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 15.6 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 177.2 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 83.3 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Midnight Black, Mist Purple, Ocean Blue, Lime Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,303 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.5% | 85.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T620 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 @850 MHz | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 570,767 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,926 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.8 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 49 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
7.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
6.77.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsInfinix Hot 60 Pro+
7.37.2
vs
ZTE Focus 2 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 14 4G
7.27.3
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsTecno Spark 40 Pro+
7.37.2
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
7.36.8


