- dotrising.com
- Compare
- KingKong 9 vs Galaxy F34
Cubot KingKong 9 vs Samsung Galaxy F34
What KingKong 9 does better (7) and where Galaxy F34 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display7.5
7.0Camera8.0
8.6Battery7.5
7.3Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
KingKong 9Galaxy F34
| KingKong 9 | Galaxy F34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 172 mm | 161.7 mm | +10.3 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 77.2 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.8 mm | +8.9 mm |
| Weight | 390 g | 208 g | +182 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is KingKong 9 better than Galaxy F34?
- Battery capacity10,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+77%
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Why is Galaxy F34 better than KingKong 9?
- OLED panelNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- Weight390 g vs 208 g+88%
- Thickness17.7 mm vs 8.8 mm2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · KingKong 9: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio74.3% vs 83.1%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 390 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 17.7 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 172 mm | 161.7 mm |
| Width | 81.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Electric Black, Mystic Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 401 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.3% | 83.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1280 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.89 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5.1 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,600 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 91 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Cubot KingKong 9vsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro
8.18.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsSamsung Galaxy F34
8.08.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23 FEvsSamsung Galaxy F34
8.38.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsInfinix Zero 30
8.28.4
vs
Motorola Edge 40vsSamsung Galaxy F34
8.28.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1