- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Cool X Wide vs Moto G17
Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Motorola Moto G17
What Cool X Wide does better (4) and where Moto G17 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Display5.3
5.1Camera6.9
3.1Battery6.5
3.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cool X WideMoto G17
| Cool X Wide | Moto G17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150.3 mm | 165.7 mm | −15.4 mm |
| Width | 94.5 mm | 76 mm | +18.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 190 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cool X Wide better than Moto G17?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is Moto G17 better than Cool X Wide?
- NFCNo · Cool X Wide: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Cool X Wide: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+13%
- Pixel density214 ppi vs 392 ppi+83%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Cool X Wide: Yes
- Weight209 g vs 190 g+10%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.2 mm+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 86.6%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 150.3 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 94.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | White, Black, Red | Pantone: Bordeaux, Alaskan Blue, Evening Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,158 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 214 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,050 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 86.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Helio G81 Extreme |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 335,081 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,298 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 57 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
