- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Cool S vs Galaxy A32 5G
Coolpad Cool S vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What Cool S does better (6) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.1Display2.4
6.3Camera6.3
3.5Battery4.0
2.9Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Cool SGalaxy A32 5G
| Cool S | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.2 mm | 164.2 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 76.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Cool S better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 270 ppi+46%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera25 MP vs 13 MP+92%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.2% vs 81.6%+4%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 9.1 mm+2%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Cool S?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- NFCNo · Cool S: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Cool S: Yes
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 161.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Moon White, Lapis Blue, Night Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 25 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3