- dotrising.com
- Compare
- B40 vs Galaxy M52 5G
Caterpillar B40 vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What B40 does better (1) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Camera7.5
4.4Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
B40Galaxy M52 5G
| B40 | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 145 mm | 164.2 mm | −19.2 mm |
| Width | 62 mm | 76.4 mm | −14.4 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 7.4 mm | +10.6 mm |
| Weight | 157 g | 173 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is B40 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Weight157 g vs 173 g+10%
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than B40?
- Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 5,000 mAh2.8×
- Main camera2 MP vs 64 MP32×
- Screen size2.4″ vs 6.7″2.8×
- OLED panelNo · B40: Yes
- 5GNo · B40: Yes
- NFCNo · B40: Yes
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 1,080 px4.5×
- Thickness18 mm vs 7.4 mm2.4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · B40: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 157 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 145 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 62 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | — | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T117 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | — | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | — | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 11 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5.1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7