How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. B35 vs 8110 4G

Caterpillar B35 vs Nokia 8110 4G

What B35 does better (4) and where 8110 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caterpillar B35
Caterpillar · 2018B35
4.0Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
Nokia 8110 4G
Nokia · 20188110 4G
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $140
3.1Camera3.1
2.2Battery2.1
4.1Features2.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

B358110 4G
60 × 1381449.3 × 133.414.9
B358110 4GDifference
Height138 mm133.4 mm+4.6 mm
Width60 mm49.3 mm+10.7 mm
Thickness14 mm14.9 mm−0.9 mm
Weight130 g117 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is B35 better than 8110 4G?

  1. Battery capacity2,300 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+53%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx24×
  3. CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz+18%
  4. Thickness14 mm vs 14.9 mm+6%

Why is 8110 4G better than B35?

  1. Weight130 g vs 117 g+11%
  2. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.4″+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 8110 4GNokia 8110 4G≈ $1403.6
Design
Weight130 g117 g
Thickness14 mm14.9 mm
Height138 mm133.4 mm
Width60 mm49.3 mm
Ingress protectionIP68IP52
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx2
ColoursBlack—
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTFTTFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density—167 ppi
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 205Qualcomm Snapdragon 205
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
CPU cores22
CPU frequency1.3 GHz1.1 GHz
GPUAdreno 304Adreno 304
Memory
RAM0 GB0 GB
Storage (max)4 GB4 GB
Storage (base)4 GB4 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera2 MP2 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity2,300 mAh1,500 mAh
Battery typeLi-Ion—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth4.14.1
NFCNo—
USB version22
Satellite navigationGPS, GLONASSGPS
Features
Stereo speakers—No
Sensorsaccelerometer—
Software
OS at launchKai OS 2.5KaiOS Smart Feature
PlatformOtheriOS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare