dotrising.com
Compare
Shark 9 vs Galaxy S24 FE

Blackview Shark 9 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

What Shark 9 does better (7) and where Galaxy S24 FE wins (24) — every spec side by side.

Blackview · 2024Shark 9

6.6Score

7 advantages

Samsung · 2024Galaxy S24 FE

8.8Score

24 advantages≈ $300

Higher score

5.0Display8.1

5.5Camera9.3

4.6Battery3.8

8.1Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Shark 9Galaxy S24 FE

	Shark 9	Galaxy S24 FE	Difference
Height	164.8 mm	162 mm	+2.8 mm
Width	75.6 mm	77.3 mm	−1.7 mm
Thickness	8.7 mm	8 mm	+0.7 mm
Weight	200 g	213 g	−13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Shark 9 better than Galaxy S24 FE?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+6%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S24 FE: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S24 FE: No
Repairability classB vs C
Weight200 g vs 213 g+6%
Endurance per cycle49 h vs 42 h+17%

Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than Shark 9?

Peak brightness700 nits vs 1,900 nits2.7×
OLED panelNo · Shark 9: Yes
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · Shark 9: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · Shark 9: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Shark 9: Yes
Wired charging18 W vs 25 W+39%
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Pixel density264 ppi vs 385 ppi+46%
Rear cameras1 vs 33×
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 120 fps4×
Battery charge cycles800 vs 2,0002.5×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Blackview Shark 96.6	Samsung Galaxy S24 FE≈ $3008.8
Design
Weight	200 g	213 g
Thickness	8.7 mm	8 mm
Height	164.8 mm	162 mm
Width	75.6 mm	77.3 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Starry Rock Black, Azure Wave Blue	Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	Dynamic AMOLED 2X
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (width)	720 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	1,604 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	264 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	700 nits	1,900 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,372 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.1%	88%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T820	Exynos 2400e
Chip maker	Unisoc	Exynos
Process	—	4 nm
CPU cores	—	10
CPU frequency	—	3.1 GHz
GPU	—	Xclipse 940
AnTuTu score	—	1,548,896
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	6,299
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	3,889
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	1	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	10 MP
4K selfie video	No	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	—	11.8 h
Wired charging	18 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	—	50%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	15 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-24.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.86 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	One UI 9
Major OS updates promised	—	7
EU label
Energy class	B	B
Battery charge cycles	800	2,000
Endurance per cycle	49 h	42 h
Repairability class	B	C
Drop resistance class	C	A