- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Fort5 vs Redmi Note 15
Blackview Fort5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
What Fort5 does better (5) and where Redmi Note 15 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.3Display8.5
7.2Camera8.6
6.6Battery7.6
6.7Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fort5Redmi Note 15
| Fort5 | Redmi Note 15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.4 mm | 164 mm | +14.4 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 75.4 mm | +7.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 7.4 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Weight | 248 g | 178 g | +70 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fort5 better than Redmi Note 15?
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 15: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 388 ppi+2%
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than Fort5?
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 3,200 nits6.4×
- OLED panelNo · Fort5: Yes
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Fort5: Yes
- 5GNo · Fort5: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+10%
- Weight248 g vs 178 g+39%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Fort5: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Thickness10.7 mm vs 7.4 mm+45%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 248 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 178.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | — | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,524 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Mediatek | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G57 MC2 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 637,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,958 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 861 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.2 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
7.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
7.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 15
8.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G
8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 2
8.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
8.68.6


