- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Fort 5 vs Poco M8x
Blackview Fort 5 vs Xiaomi Poco M8x
What Fort 5 does better (12) and where Poco M8x wins (10) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fort 5Poco M8x
| Fort 5 | Poco M8x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 178.4 mm | 170.1 mm | +8.3 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 78.4 mm | +4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.8 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 248 g | 232 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fort 5 better than Poco M8x?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Poco M8x: No
- NFCYes · Poco M8x: No
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 254 ppi+56%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 8 MP6.2×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Poco M8x better than Fort 5?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,900 mAh+58%
- 5GNo · Fort 5: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Fort 5: Yes
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Fort 5: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Weight248 g vs 232 g+7%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness10.7 mm vs 8.8 mm+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.7% vs 86.2%+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 248 g | 232 g |
| Thickness | 10.7 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 178.4 mm | 170.1 mm |
| Width | 83 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Cyber Yellow, Warrior Black | Leather Green, Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 700 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.7% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 624,021 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,230 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,900 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | DokeOS 5.0 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 500 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 48 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
