- dotrising.com
- Compare
- BV6600E vs Galaxy A32 5G
Blackview BV6600E vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What BV6600E does better (2) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display2.4
2.7Camera6.3
7.1Battery4.0
4.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV6600EGalaxy A32 5G
| BV6600E | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 164.2 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Width | 79.4 mm | 76.1 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 9.1 mm | +8.9 mm |
| Weight | 325 g | 205 g | +120 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV6600E better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Battery capacity8,580 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+72%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 270 ppi+4%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than BV6600E?
- Main camera13 MP vs 48 MP3.7×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Wired charging10 W vs 15 W+50%
- 5GNo · BV6600E: Yes
- NFCNo · BV6600E: Yes
- Weight325 g vs 205 g+59%
- Process28 nm vs 7 nm4×
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 13 MP2.6×
- CPU frequency1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+25%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 325 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 79.4 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Dragontrail Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 66.4% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,580 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3