- dotrising.com
- Compare
- BV6600 vs Galaxy A22 5G
Blackview BV6600 vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
What BV6600 does better (2) and where Galaxy A22 5G wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display4.3
3.7Camera5.3
7.8Battery4.0
6.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
BV6600Galaxy A22 5G
| BV6600 | Galaxy A22 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159 mm | 167.2 mm | −8.2 mm |
| Width | 79.4 mm | 76.4 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 9 mm | +9 mm |
| Weight | 325 g | 203 g | +122 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BV6600 better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Battery capacity8,580 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+72%
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than BV6600?
- Main camera16 MP vs 48 MP3×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 5GNo · BV6600: Yes
- Weight325 g vs 203 g+60%
- Pixel density282 ppi vs 399 ppi+41%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+22%
- Thickness18 mm vs 9 mm2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · BV6600: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · BV6600: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 325 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 18 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 159 mm | 167.2 mm |
| Width | 79.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange, Green | Gray, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,440 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 399 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 380 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 385 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 66.4% | 82.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762V/WD Helio A25 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 242,155 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 6,913 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 320 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,580 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.73 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI core 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.95.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsHonor 50 Lite
5.96.1