- dotrising.com
- Compare
- A100 vs Galaxy A32 5G
Blackview A100 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What A100 does better (8) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Display2.4
4.3Camera6.3
3.2Battery4.1
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
A100Galaxy A32 5G
| A100 | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.3 mm | 164.2 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 205 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A100 better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 270 ppi+46%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight195 g vs 205 g+5%
- CPU frequency2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 9.1 mm+3%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than A100?
- Main camera12 MP vs 48 MP4×
- 5GNo · A100: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,680 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+7%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · A100: Yes
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Bluetooth4.2 vs 5+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 166.3 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Green, Pink | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771T Helio P70 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,680 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsRealme C25
5.25.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2


