- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs T909
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Tel.Me. T909
What SL260 LTE does better (4) and where T909 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTET909
| SL260 LTE | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 109 mm | +21 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 44 mm | +15 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 22 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 95 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than T909?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 600 mAh+33%
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 22 mm+75%
- Weight90 g vs 95 g+6%
Why is T909 better than SL260 LTE?
T909 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | — |
| Panel | LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | — |
| Pixel density | 128 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 19.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
