- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs KX-TU250
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Panasonic KX-TU250
What SL260 LTE does better (2) and where KX-TU250 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTEKX-TU250
| SL260 LTE | KX-TU250 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 127 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm | +7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 106 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than KX-TU250?
- Weight90 g vs 106 g+18%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 15 mm+19%
Why is KX-TU250 better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+88%
- Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
- Resolution (width)176 px vs 240 px+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 127 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 27% |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
