- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs 110 4G 2nd Edition
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition
What SL260 LTE does better (4) and where 110 4G 2nd Edition wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTE110 4G 2nd Edition
| SL260 LTE | 110 4G 2nd Edition | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 121.5 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.4 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 94 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than 110 4G 2nd Edition?
- Screen size2.2″ vs 1.8″+22%
- Weight90 g vs 94 g+5%
- Resolution (width)176 px vs 120 px+47%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 14.4 mm+14%
Why is 110 4G 2nd Edition better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
- Dual SIMNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 94 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Silver, Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 0.1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Nokia Series 30+ |
| Platform | — | Other |
