- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs C200 Comfort 4G
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Funker C200 Comfort 4G
What SL260 LTE does better (2) and where C200 Comfort 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTEC200 Comfort 4G
| SL260 LTE | C200 Comfort 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 105 mm | +25 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm | +7 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 21.3 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 128 g | −38 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than C200 Comfort 4G?
- Weight90 g vs 128 g+42%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 21.3 mm+69%
Why is C200 Comfort 4G better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+25%
- Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 128 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 21.3 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 105 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 52 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | — |
| Pixel density | 128 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 19.9% | — |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
