- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL230 LTE vs KX-TU260
Bea-Fon SL230 LTE vs Panasonic KX-TU260
What SL230 LTE does better (3) and where KX-TU260 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL230 LTEKX-TU260
| SL230 LTE | KX-TU260 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119 mm | 133 mm | −14 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm | = |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 119 g | −29 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL230 LTE better than KX-TU260?
- Weight90 g vs 119 g+32%
- Dual SIMYes · KX-TU260: No
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 15 mm+19%
Why is KX-TU260 better than SL230 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,500 mAh+88%
- Screen size1.8″ vs 2.4″+33%
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 240 px+88%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 119 mm | 133 mm |
| Width | 55 mm | 55 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 250 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 24.5% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 1 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
