- dotrising.com
- Compare
- A930 GPS 4G Senior vs Armor Mini 4
Aligator A930 GPS 4G Senior vs UleFone Armor Mini 4
What A930 GPS 4G Senior does better (2) and where Armor Mini 4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Camera3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
A930 GPS 4G SeniorArmor Mini 4
| A930 GPS 4G Senior | Armor Mini 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 143 mm | 142.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 63 mm | −5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 15 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 150 g | −55 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A930 GPS 4G Senior better than Armor Mini 4?
- Weight95 g vs 150 g+58%
- Thickness13.6 mm vs 15 mm+10%
Why is Armor Mini 4 better than A930 GPS 4G Senior?
- Battery capacity1,700 mAh vs 2,100 mAh+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 95 g | 150 g |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 143 mm | 142.9 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 63 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | — | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 27% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc T117 |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,700 mAh | 2,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | — | 5 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 2.4 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
